|
Summary :
I - WHAT IS GRAHAM's FORMULA ?
A - A FEW IMPLICATIONS
OF GRAHAM'S FORMULA
1 - Price Earning Ratio (P/E) as a
function of future growth (G)
2 - Implicit Growth derived from price
and earnings.
B -
HOW TO ESTIMATE LONG TERM GROWTH ?
C - COMPARING GRAHAM's FORMULA WITH DISCOUNTED CASH
FLOW METHOD
E - GRAHAM'S FORMULA LIMITATIONS
D - BACK TESTING GRAHAM'S FORMULA
II - HOW IS GRAHAM's FORMULA APPLIED ON INVESTINVALUE.COM ?
I - WHAT IS GRAHAM'S
FORMULA ?
Benjamin Graham describes a formula he used to value
stocks in the 11th chapter of the “Intelligent Investor”.(whole
text here) :
"Most
of the writing of security analysts on formal appraisals relates
to the valuation of growth stocks. Our study of the various methods
has led us to suggest a foreshortened and quite simple formula for
the valuation of growth stocks, which is intended to produce figures
fairly close to those resulting from the more refined mathematical
calculations.
Our formula is :
Intrinsic Value = Current Earnings x (8.5 + 2 x Expected Annual
Growth Rate)
The growth figure should be that expected over the next seven to
ten years."
Example n°1 : A stock
is trading at 120$. Its current earnings are 8$ per share. The annual
growth rate over the next 7 to 10 years should be around 7%. The
Intrinsic Value is = 8 *( 8.5 + 2 * 7) = 180 $. The Margin of Safety
is : (180 - 120) / 180 = 33%.
Example n°2 : the same
stock is still trading at 120$, but its earnings are revised to
9$ per share and the annual long term growth rate should now be
around 8%. The Intrinsic Value becomes = 9 *( 8.5 + 2 * 8) = 220.5.
The Margin of Safety is : (220.5 - 120) / 220.5 = 56%.
Example n°3 : the same
stock is trading at 120$, its earnings are 5.5$ per share, the annual
growth rate around 6.5%.
The Intrinsic Value is = 5.5 *( 8.5 + 2 * 6.5) = 118. The Margin
of Safety is : (118 - 120) / 118 = -1%.
A - A FEW IMPLICATIONS OF GRAHAM'S
FORMULA
1 - Price Earning Ratio (P/E) as a function of future
growth (G)
If we assume that Intrinsic Value = Price, then Graham's Formula
is equivalent to : Price / Earnings = 8.5 + 2 x G.
In other words, the P/E for a no-growth company (G
= 0) should be around 8.5.
2 - Implicit Growth derived from
price and earnings.
From the fomula above, a P/E can be linked to G this way : G = (P/E
- 8.5) / 2.
| P/E |
5
|
8.5
|
10
|
15
|
20
|
25
|
30
|
| Long term annual GROWTH (in %) |
-1.75
|
0
|
0.75
|
3.25
|
5.75
|
8.25
|
10.75
|
or graphically :
Example : If a stock is trading at 100$ and has earnings of 5$,
then we have : G = ( P/E - 8.5 ) / 2 = (100/5 - 8.5) / 2 = (20-8.5)/2
= 11.5 / 2 = 5.75%.
B - HOW TO ESTIMATE LONG TERM
GROWTH ?
Estimating long term growth over the next seven
to ten years as required
by Benjamin Graham is a key point. Unfortunately, what is certain
about future growth is that it is unpredictable. Yet, a few techniques
are available :
- dividing earnings current earnings by earnings ten years ago and
assuming that past growth will reflect future.
- dividing average earnings on last three years by average 3 years
earnings ten years ago
- estimating future growth by fundamentals from the balance sheet
- linear regression or log-linear regressions : this is the one
chosen on Investinvalue.com.
- you can also try this one : here
A good study of the different ways of estimating growth (...
and much more...) is available on Pr. Aswath Damodaran website :
here
C - COMPARING GRAHAM's FORMULA WITH DISCOUNTED CASH
FLOW METHOD ?
A good website to compare valuation methods is MoneyChimp : here
GRAHAM'S FORMULA / DCF SIMULATOR : With this simulator
(click HERE) you can compare the fair value
given by a two-stage discounted cash flows model with the fair value
of Graham's Formula.
D - GRAHAM'S FORMULA LIMITATIONS
Concerning Future Growth Rate :
Investinvalue.com utilizes a linear regression of past 10 years
earnings to determine growth rates : the last ten years may or may
not reflect the future growth rate. Competitive landscapes change,
capital structures change, and hence earnings growth rates will
be affected.
Concerning the level of Current E.P.S. :
- earnings may be bloated or understated depending on accounting
choices.
- cyclical businesses in the late stages of an economy will have
a very high earnings base that is used as the basis of the valuation.
- Balance sheet leverage is also not considered in the valuation.
- Businesses that are currently loss-making are worth zero in this
analysis.
What follows is taken from an excellent blog
: http://valuediscipline.blogspot.com/
" This raises another important reminder.
Valuation is an incredibly imprecise art. In some ways, the development
of the spreadsheet was one of the most dangerous inventions of the
twentieth century. Extrapolating data into the hereafter without
consideration of its reasonableness, without consideration of competitive
advantage periods, and without considering something other than
linear growth has often provided ridiculous results.
Though elegant spreadsheet models may create an
illusion of precision, their complexities do not necessarily suggest
greater accuracy than the Graham model. I do prefer free cash flow
based valuation models but like every model, the valuation is entirely
dependent on the input assumptions. Man have I gotten a lot of those
wrong over time, but the spreadsheet sure looked impressive.
I think the website is definitely worth a look and
a spin. You may or may not agree with the valuation it accords your
stock, but at least it should make you think about the reasonableness
of your assumptions. If it achieves that, it's a great site."
E - BACK TESTING GRAHAM'S FORMULA
GRAHAM's formula has been applied to S&P500
index since 1940. The
datas come from Professor Robert J. Shiller (Yale University).

|